Slashdot Log In
Intel in the News
First, forget Dual Core. Or even Quad Core. Here's a PC Pro story headlined Intel finally demos 80-core pocessor. There has been talk about this ultra-mighy-processor in the past, but this is its first public unveiling. No, it won't run Windows (or any known desktop Linux distro), but still: 6 GHz, 2 teraflop performance. That'd be nice to have around the shop purely for bragging rights, wouldn't it? Surely we can come up with *some* kind of "practical" use for the thing that'll get our bosses to spring for one, right? Worth a try....
Even our humble desktop is getting some Intel-related press play -- and for a change we're talking about looks, not the mobo or uP (although Core microarchitecture *is* at work inside the box), specifically Intel's Million-Dollar PC Design Challenge. The winner is.... (click here to find out).
There was also an announcement about system-on-a-chip, which may finally be moving from pipe dream to reality according to Seeking Alpha. Imagine the design possibilities...
If you're an engineering student in the People's Republic of China, you'll be happy to learn that Intel is now working with 37 Chinese universities to help train students in multi-core development. Even better: a $6500 Multi-Core programming design contest award is up for grabs. We'd love to see a Chinese Slashdot reader win it!
For more (LOTS more!) about what's going on at the Beijing Intel Development Forum, HEXUS.net has a whole section devoted to it. It's well worth a look if you're interested in following the latest Intel announcements and product launches.
Meanwhile, Intel engineers are still answering questions about Core Microarchitecture. Please join the discussion. It's gotten pretty interesting -- at least to our admittedly biased eyes.
Related Stories
Please keep in mind that we are hardware experts, not software, so questions on virtualization, security and multi-threading optimizations are outside of our realm.
The three of us are located in Oregon, on the West coast of the USA, and will be responding to your questions and comments on a daily basis.If for some reason you have no questions for us, I'd be interested in your response to a couple of my own:
- What is more important, a processor having particular architecture features or a processor that has the best performance?
- How do you use information displayed by some hardware monitoring programs such as processor temperatures or voltages?
